Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389307›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Outcomes of vertebral column resection in rigid, severe adult and pediatric spinal deformities.

Mehmet Erkilinc, Munish Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet ErkilincDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Munish GuptaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Managing severe and rigid spinal deformities is challenging to correct. Vertebral column resection (VCR) is often necessary for adequate correction. Substantial risks remain with blood loss, prolonged operative time, and risk to the neural elements. We studied VCR in rigid spinal deformities, including deformity correction, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) alerts, spinal cord/nerve injuries, and perioperative adverse events. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 55 patients who underwent VCR for severe and rigid spinal deformities with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Demographic data, diagnosis, comorbidities, radiographic parameters, and all adverse events were collected. Results: Twenty-four pediatric patients and 31 adult patients underwent VCR for rigid, severe scoliosis, kyphosis, or short angular deformities. The average Cobb angle for scoliotic deformities was 106.9°, ranging from 66° to 131°. The average angle of kyphosis was 90.6° (78°-108°). The average flexibility index was 15.7% ±10.9%. Two of pediatric cases and 11 of adult cases were revisions. The average postoperative correction rate was 68%. The average estimated blood loss was 1066 ml (150-5500 ml). Seven dural tears were repaired with no short-or long-term sequelae. Four of seven patients who had dural tear were revision cases. The incidence (30%) of dural tear in revision cases was significantly higher than primary cases. Six (10.9%) patients had IONM alerts during the surgery. None of the patients suffered from a spinal cord injury with a neurologic deficit. Conclusions: VCR can be a safe and effective option for correcting rigid and severe spinal deformities as demonstrated by this series.

Indexed as

Kyphosisscoliosisthree-column vertebral resection

Identifiers

PMID42389307
PMCPMC13322716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.