ArticleJournal of cardiovascular echography
Novel Data on Left Atrial Strain by Echocardiography in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular echography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study confronts the diagnostic challenge of identifying diastolic heart failure (HF) in patients with normal systolic function in the early stages of HF. Materials and Methods: The study evaluated patients with HF symptoms, excluding those with evidence of increased ventricular filling pressure. All patients underwent stress echocardiography and were categorized into two groups: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure) and those with normal left ventricle filling pressure. Echocardiography measured left atrial (LA) strain in three phases. Results: Among the 64 patients, 47 exhibited Grade 1 diastolic dysfunction (DD), and 17 had Grade 2 dysfunction (HFpEF). Echocardiographic factors, including the peak jet velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) exercise, A during rest, E/E' during rest and exercise, LA volume, LA volume index, LA vol index/S1 + S2 + S3, LA vol index/Strain 1, and LA stiffness (E/E'/Strain 1) were significantly lower in Grade 1 diastolic HF than in Grade 2 patients. In contrast, E during rest and exercise, E' during exercise, Strain 1, Strain 2, Strain 3, S1 + S2 + S3, and LVEDD/body surface area were significantly higher in Grade 1 diastolic HF than in Grade 2 patients. In receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, LA vol index/S1 + S2 + S3, LA vol index/S1, Strain 1, S1 + S2 + S3, and E/E'/Strain 1 showed the potential clinical applicability in diagnosing diastolic HF. Conclusion: Alterations in atrial strain could potentially serve as an early indicator for diagnosing DD. Atrial stiffness with a cutoff of 1.25 can distinguish Grade 2 HF from Grade 1 with high sensitivity and specificity. However, more investigations in this field are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.