Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389600›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Belief updating in uncertain environments is differentially sensitive to reward and punishment learning: Evidence from ERP.

Lingyun Xiang, Baike Li, Meng Liu, Weijun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lingyun XiangInstitute of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Baike LiDepartment of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Meng LiuDepartment of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Weijun LiInstitute of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning from rewards and punishments relies on prediction errors and belief updating, yet it remains unclear how motivational context reshapes the precision-weighting of prediction errors and neural mechanism while learning in volatile environments. We employed a probabilistic classification task with electroencephalography (EEG) within a hierarchical Bayesian framework to compare reward and punishment learning. Our findings indicate that participants performed better in reward context compared to punishment context. Fitting the hierarchical Bayesian model revealed that punishment drives faster Bayesian belief updates, although these did not translate into improved behavioral outcomes. At the neural level, higher-level precision-weighted prediction error (pwPE

Indexed as

Cognitive neuroscienceNeuroscienceSensory neuroscienceTechniques in neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID42389600
PMCPMC13319946

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.