Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telerehabilitation2026

Unsupervised Machine Learning in the Evaluation of Telerehabilitation Interventions for Reading Fluency.

Chiara Pecini, Andrea Frascari, Viola Margheri, Kianna Kazemi, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Gionata Manduchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telerehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chiara PeciniDepartment of Education, Intercultures, Literature and Psychology (FORLILPSI), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Andrea FrascariAnastasis Social Cooperative Society, Bologna, Italy.
Viola MargheriDepartment of Education, Intercultures, Literature and Psychology (FORLILPSI), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Kianna KazemiIFAB International Foundation Big Data and Artificial Intelligence for Human Development, Bologna, Italy.
Pierluigi ZoccolottiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gionata ManduchiIFAB International Foundation Big Data and Artificial Intelligence for Human Development, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of machine learning techniques enables the analysis of large data corpora to differentiate response patterns based on exercise parameters, providing insights for implementing efficient telerehabilitation of reading skills. In this study, we applied unsupervised machine learning methods to investigate rehabilitation training trajectories in response to a self-adaptive teleintervention of reading decoding. We analyzed data from 6,692 children and adolescents using the Reading Trainer app for at least two months. Using K-means clustering, we identified eight distinct learning curve patterns, subsequently categorized as No-responders, Partial Responders, and High Responders based on the differences between initial and final reading performance. Multinomial regression analysis showed that younger children with greater initial difficulties and those who completed a higher number of in-session exercises during treatment were more likely to be classified as High Responders. These findings provide crucial insights to predict responses to reading intervention and help in personalizing telerehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

Learning disorderMachine learningReadingTelerehabilitationUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID42389617
PMCPMC13321850

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.