ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2026
A Model to Facilitate Resilience Among Diagnostic Radiography Students.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA significant increase in the demand for radiography examinations and the corresponding rise in the workload of radiographers has been noted. Radiography imaging departments serve patients presenting with a wide range of conditions and abilities, and student radiographers have reported feeling unprepared, lacking confidence and experiencing stress and anxiety during such interactions. Additionally, they encounter challenges with effective communication and interpersonal engagement, making it difficult for them to recover from difficult experiences. These challenges highlight the need for research on resilience among student radiographers. The aim of the paper is to describe the process undertaken to develop a model to facilitate resilience in DR students, and to present the developed model.
methodA qualitative, exploratory, descriptive, contextual and theory-generative approach was used to develop a model for facilitating resilience among diagnostic radiography (DR) students. Data were collected through focus groups with first-year DR students. Finalisation of the model was informed through input by experts in model development, radiography and nursing education.
resultsFive focus groups were analysed using thematic analysis, yielding four themes: students' understanding of resilience, students' readiness to commence in the clinical workplace, interpersonal interactions as they relate to the clinical environment and adapting to the clinical environment. Through inductive reasoning, central concepts were identified with facilitation, self-efficacy and social connections, forming the basis of the resilience model.
conclusionThe model designed for the facilitation of resilience is recommended for use as a framework for educators to foster resilience among DR students.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.