ArticleBioanalysis2026
ADA assays for high-dose biologics: redefining drug tolerance through clinical insights.
Article in Bioanalysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced assay design for characterizing anti-drug antibody responses in clinical serum samples.Bioanalysis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The validation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays is vital in biologics development, with regulatory bodies like EMA and FDA emphasizing drug tolerance. In patient care, drug tolerance assessments should reflect actual clinical use. We developed an ADA assay for a fully human monoclonal antibody used in oncology, addressing the challenges posed by high circulating drug levels and target biology. Various assay formats were tested using multiple positive controls and drug concentrations that mimic real-world exposure and drug-to-ADA ratios. Assessing different positive controls at various concentrations was key to characterizing sensitivity and drug tolerance. An assay initially showing low drug tolerance with one monoclonal control performed adequately with others. Rather than limiting assessments to a single sensitivity level, we evaluated assay performance using clinically relevant drug and ADA concentrations. This approach ensures the assay's sensitivity and drug tolerance are meaningful for patient management and therapeutic decisions. Early and ongoing collaboration with health authorities supported alignment of clinically relevant performance criteria and interpretation strategies. Ultimately, this patient-oriented strategy guarantees ADA results that inform patient safety and treatment effectiveness for high-dose biologic therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.