Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390298›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026

The Development, Validation and Reliability of the Sports Injury Prevention Behavior Determinants Questionnaire.

Roar Amundsen, Emilie Scholten Sjølie, Carly McKay, Siv Gjesdal, Hege Grindem, Grethe Myklebust, Christian Thue Bjørndal, Merete Møller

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roar AmundsenOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2664-7753
Emilie Scholten SjølieOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Carly McKayCentre for Health and Injury and Illness Prevention in Sport, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Siv GjesdalDepartment of Coaching and Psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Hege GrindemOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Grethe MyklebustOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0692-7494
Christian Thue BjørndalDepartment of Coaching and Psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Merete MøllerOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7514-0399

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 326946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Valid data on behavioral determinants are essential to enhance adherence to injury prevention (IP) programs. This study reports the development and validation of the Sports Injury Prevention Behavior Determinants Questionnaire for youth handball and football players (12-17 years) and their coaches. Using the Health Action Process Approach framework, we followed consensus-based guidelines, including conceptualisation, focus groups, cognitive interviews, and a cross-sectional study for both players and coaches. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability testing, and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed for the coach questionnaire only. Focus groups identified training load management, pain and injury management, and injury prevention training as key IP elements. These were integrated with relevant HAPA constructs during item development and refined through cognitive interviews. A cross-sectional study (337 coaches, 528 players) and CFA informed the final coach version, which was subsequently evaluated using a test-retest design. PCA included 59 coaches while the reliability analysis included 45 due to drop out. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good reliability (> 0.75) for all constructs in the coach questionnaire, although self-efficacy constructs showed small systematic differences (≤ 0.04; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.06). PCA led to minor refinements of the questionnaire. The Sports Injury Prevention Behavior Determinants Questionnaire is the first validated tool to assess IP behavioral determinants in youth handball and football coaches, with applicability across team sports. The player version followed the initial steps to ensure good face and content validity but requires refinement based on CFA and further reliability testing and PCA.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesHealth BehaviorAdolescentAthletic TrainersChildCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFocus GroupsFootballHumansMalePrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesYouth SportsbehaviorHAPAinjury preventionquestionnairereliabilityvalidityyouth sports

Identifiers

PMID42390298
PMCPMC13326505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.