ArticleSurgery today2026
Accelerated use of artificial intelligence-associated vocabulary in Japanese surgical journals after 2023.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe increased use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based writing tools may influence academic writing styles. This study aimed to evaluate changes in writing styles in Japanese surgical journals using quantitative time-series analysis.
methodsWe analyzed articles published between 2015 and 2025 in Surgery Today and Surgical Case Reports. The writing style was quantified using predefined lexical sets for rare and common AI-related words and promotional words. The word density was calculated for each article separately. We conducted interrupted time-series analyses with 2023 as the intervention year. Observed post-2023 values were compared with the expected values based on pre-2023 trends.
resultsRare-word density showed a marked post-2023 increase, with a significant change in slope (β = 1.05 per year, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10, p < 0.001). The common-word density also increased after 2023 (β = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.46-0.51; p < 0.001). Promotional word density showed a smaller but statistically significant increase in the post-2023 slope (β = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.24-0.44; p < 0.001). For all three measures, the observed post-2023 values exceeded the expected values that were extrapolated from the pre-2023 trends.
conclusionPost-2023, the increase in AI-associated lexical marker use in Japanese surgical journals showed accelerated growth compared to the expected long-term trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390577What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.