ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Physical exercise in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: state of the art and future challenges beyond common misconceptions.
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a progressive inherited myopathy characterized by muscle weakness, fatty infiltration, and consequent reduction in functional capacity. In this context, physical exercise (PE) has been proposed as a non-pharmacological strategy aimed at preserving physical efficiency. However, its prescription in FSHD has historically been approached with caution due to concerns regarding overwork weakness and potential exacerbation of muscle damage. As a result, clinical management has often remained conservative, with limited and non-standardized PE recommendations. Nevertheless, physical inactivity may further contribute to deconditioning, loss of autonomy, and deterioration in quality of life, highlighting a clear tension between perceived risk and potential benefit. In this framework, identifying safe and effective PE strategies represents a central unmet need in FSHD care. Possibly due to disease rarity and historical concerns, the available literature on PE in FSHD remains fragmented, limiting the strength of definitive conclusions. A structured synthesis of existing evidence may help clarify feasible and potentially effective exercise modalities, as well as guide the development of optimized intervention strategies. This review critically examines the current evidence on PE in FSHD, with specific reference to aerobic, anaerobic, and combined training interventions. The potential synergistic role of concomitant nutritional strategies is also considered. The critical analysis highlights exercise modalities that appear more consistently safe and potentially beneficial, while underscoring substantial methodological limitations across studies. Finally, emerging concepts in exercise tailoring are discussed, with the aim of addressing the clinical variability of FSHD and informing future prospective, controlled investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.