SynthesisSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Anatomic variations in basilar artery termination: a systematic review and meta-analysis with presentation of an illustrative case.
Synthesis in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite extensive literature on anatomical variations of the basilar artery, evidence on its termination patterns is limited. We sought out to systematically pool the prevalence of basilar artery termination variations and describe their neurointerventional implications with an illustrative case.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of human basilar artery termination patterns in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched. A risk of bias assessment was performed using the JBI critical appraisal tool. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed in R using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed, and pre-specified subgroup analyses were conducted based on study type (deceased donor vs. imaging). We also present a case of basilar artery non-furcation identified during a dissection.
resultsFrom 8469 initial records, 31 articles were eligible for quantitative analysis. The classic bifurcation pattern was most common, with a pooled prevalence of 85.94% [95% CI 56.65-96.62%]. The estimated pooled prevalences for variations were: non-furcation 8.95% [95% CI 6.20-12.74%], trifurcation 7.05% [95% CI 3.56-13.50%], quadrifurcation 5.30% [95% CI 2.16-12.45%], and pentafurcation 2.92% [95% CI 1.08-7.67%]. Hexafurcation was reported in a single study (0.87%). Imaging studies generally reported higher prevalence for variations compared to deceased donor cohorts.
conclusionA significant proportion (14% of the population) possess variations, with non-furcation and trifurcation being most common. An understanding of these anatomical variations, as highlighted by our review and case presentation, is critical for clinical practice in neuroradiology and neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.