ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable Colon Cancer: Evidence, Controversies, and an Implementation Roadmap for 2026.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colon cancer has emerged as a potential strategy to improve systemic treatment delivery, enhance tumor downstaging, and facilitate margin-negative resection in selected patients with locally advanced disease. However, its role remains controversial because radiologic staging is imperfect and long-term survival benefits have not been uniformly demonstrated.
methodsWe performed a narrative review of the contemporary evidence on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable colon cancer, focusing on randomized trials, comparative studies, meta-analyses, and implementation issues. Key trials included FOxTROT, which randomized patients 2:1 to 6 weeks of preoperative oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine plus 18 weeks postoperative therapy versus 24 weeks postoperative therapy; OPTICAL, which evaluated 3 months of preoperative mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX followed by surgery and 3 months postoperative chemotherapy; PRODIGE 22; and the phase III NeoCol trial. A 2024 meta-analysis of seven comparative studies including 2120 patients was also reviewed.
resultsFOxTROT showed reduced 2-year residual or recurrent disease (16.9% vs. 21.5%; rate ratio 0.72; P = 0.037), improved downstaging, and higher complete resection rates, with fewer serious postoperative complications despite 4.3% requiring expedited surgery for obstruction. OPTICAL reported improved pathologic response and overall survival (HR 0.44; P = 0.002), although disease-free survival was not statistically significant (82.1% vs. 77.5%; HR 0.74; P = 0.08). NeoCol did not show significant DFS or OS differences. The meta-analysis suggested improved recurrence, overall survival, and incomplete resection risk without excess operative morbidity.
conclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and biologically active in selected locally advanced resectable colon cancer, but benefit depends on accurate patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390664What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.