SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
The dual role of mTOR in multiple sclerosis pathophysiology: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by demyelination, neuroinflammation, and progressive neurodegeneration. The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway plays a key role in regulating immune responses, cell metabolism, autophagy, and repair processes. Although the role of mTOR in neurodegeneration has been explored in previous reviews, a systematic assessment of its function in MS across different models is still lacking. This systematic review aimed to examine the role of mTOR signaling in the pathophysiology of MS. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we screened preclinical and clinical studies using two databases and assessed the risk of bias specific to the study types. A total of 189 records were identified, of which 90 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Studies using in vitro and in vivo (mainly rodent models, both sexes) models of MS, as well as MS patient tissue or data, consistently demonstrated that mTOR is involved in the MS-related processes neuroinflammation, myelination, autophagy, gliosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress. mTOR inhibition reduces pro-inflammatory signaling and may enhance autophagy, offering neuroprotection. In contrast, activation of mTOR promotes remyelination by enhancing oligodendrocyte differentiation and maturation. These remyelinating effects may be masked in inflammatory environments, because activation of mTOR supports immune cell expansion and glial reactivity, inducing inflammation and oxidative stress. Overall, our findings underscore a dual role of mTOR in MS pathology, with important implications for disease stage and timing of intervention. Although mTOR is mechanistically important in MS, its therapeutic modulation is unlikely to be readily clinically translatable without a substantial risk of unintended and context-dependent effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390760What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.