ArticlePLoS medicine2026
Accelerometry-measured prolonged and interrupted sedentary behavior and cancer incidence and mortality: A cohort study of 91,292 UK Biobank participants.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent sedentary behavior (SB) guidelines primarily emphasize total time spent sedentary. We explored differences between interrupted and prolonged SB in relation to a range of cancer outcomes. METHODS AND
findingsThis study included 91,292 UK Biobank participants with valid accelerometer data. Participants were followed for a median of 12.38 years (interquartile range 11.56-13.15 years). A two-step approach based on a random forest model was used to classify SB. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were applied to overall incident cancers and cancer deaths, plus obesity-related and type-2 diabetes-related cancers, and 23 site-specific cancers. Models were adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, dietary, and health-status factors, including age, ethnicity, deprivation, education, smoking, alcohol intake, diet, and morbidity count. Isotemporal substitution models were used to estimate the associated cancer risk when replacing prolonged SB with intermittent SB, or physical activity (PA). After adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, each additional hour of prolonged SB was associated with a higher risk of overall cancer mortality (hazard ratio [HR] HR1hour 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.06, 1.11]; p < 0.001). Replacing 1 hour per day of prolonged SB with light PA (HRLPA 0.88; 95% CI [0.79, 0.99]; p = 0.033) was associated with lower risk of overall cancer mortality. Similarly, replacing 30 min per day of prolonged SB with moderate PA (HRMPA 0.92; 95% CI [0.86, 0.99]; p = 0.024) was associated with a lower risk of overall cancer mortality. The main methodological limitations were observational design, residual confounding, healthy volunteer bias, and measurement imprecision due to having only 7 days of accelerometer wear.
conclusionCancer risk associated with SB is specific to prolonged SB. Replacing prolonged SB physical activity is associated with lower cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.