Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391180›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.

Giulia Pullano, Shweta Bansal, Stefania Rubrichi, Vittoria Colizza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Characterizing the impact of incorporating spatially aggregated human mobility data into infectious disease models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulia PullanoDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-0734
Shweta BansalDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Stefania RubrichiOrange Research - SENSE, Châtillon, France.
Vittoria ColizzaSorbonne Université, INSERM, Sorbonne Université Modeling Outbreaks Center (SUMOC), Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-2374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human mobility fundamentally shapes the spatial spread of infectious diseases, yet the level of detail required from mobility data to accurately inform epidemic models remains unclear. Mobile phone records offer unprecedented resolution on population movements, but little attention has been devoted however to determining (i) which aspects of mobility are epidemiologically relevant and (ii) what level of data resolution is necessary to capture spatial invasion dynamics. Using mobile phone records from 9.5 million users in Senegal (approximately 80% of the population), we systematically compare three approaches to aggregating mobility data for epidemic modeling. These approaches span a range of resolutions: high-resolution tracking of all individual displacements between consecutive visited locations (HR), medium-resolution accounting for time spent in all visited locations (MR), and low-resolution identification of the most-visited location (LR). We incorporate these mobility representations into a metapopulation epidemic model that explicitly accounts for transmission from residents, visitors, and returning travelers, and simulate diseases with varying transmissibility corresponding to controlled epidemic conditions, seasonal influenza-like transmission, and highly transmissible pathogens. We find that preserving all observed displacements in individual trajectories does not necessarily improve the epidemiological relevance of mobility in pathogens spatial transmission. Instead, displacement-based networks fragment long-range trips and underestimate key spatial connections relevant for disease spread. In contrast, approaches that capture where individuals spend most of their time (such as home, work, or school) more accurately reproduce spatial invasion patterns. Accounting for additional daily activities beyond these primary locations provides little additional epidemiological information. Our results suggest that lower-resolution mobility indicators capturing time spent at key locations are sufficient to inform predictive epidemic models. These findings have important implications for both epidemic modeling and data governance, indicating that mobile phone data can be aggregated to reduce privacy issues while still providing the essential information needed to model spatial disease transmission.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneCommunicable DiseasesEpidemicsEpidemiological ModelsTravelComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansSenegal

Identifiers

PMID42391180
PMCPMC13327251

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.