Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391241›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Music-induced cortical plasticity: Protocol for a systematic review.

Isaiah Osei Duah Junior, Danielle S Rodriguez, Cassandra M Germain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isaiah Osei Duah JuniorDepartment of Psychology, John R. and Kathy R. Hairston, College of Health and Human Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-8602
Danielle S RodriguezDepartment of Psychology, John R. and Kathy R. Hairston, College of Health and Human Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.
Cassandra M GermainDepartment of Psychology, John R. and Kathy R. Hairston, College of Health and Human Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music engages sensory, motor, cognitive, and emotional systems, making it a powerful model for studying experience-dependent neuroplasticity. Although research on music-related brain changes is expanding, integration of structural, functional, and cerebrovascular findings remains limited, and effects on higher-order cognitive processes remain unclear. This systematic review will primarily synthesize evidence on music-induced cortical adaptations, including structural changes (e.g., gray and white matter alterations), functional modifications in neural networks, and cerebrovascular dynamics. Further, associations with behavioral measures such as attentional control, executive functioning, and language processing will also be examined when these outcomes are directly linked to the neural adaptations across the adult lifespan (≥ 50 years). The protocol was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines and has been indexed in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251159362). The systematic review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Using controlled vocabularies and medical subject headings (MeSH), a systematic search will be conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google Scholar databases, and supplemented by citation tracking from relevant review articles. Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and observational designs (longitudinal, case-control, cross-sectional studies). The primary outcome will be changes in brain structure, function, and cerebrovascular hemodynamic activity following music intervention. Cognitive measures will be reviewed and consolidated as secondary endpoints. Data extraction, risk of bias and quality assessment will be performed independently by two reviewers using validated instruments, including Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2.0), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) tools. A narrative synthesis will be conducted in accordance with Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines, with meta-analyses undertaken where appropriate. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) scale. Collectively, this protocol establishes a rigorous framework to systematically evaluate how music shapes the brain's structure, function, and vascular systems, and how these changes translate into cognitive and behavioral outcomes.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexMusicNeuronal PlasticityHumansSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42391241
PMCPMC13327256

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.