ReviewReproduction (Cambridge, England)2026
Spatial transcriptomics in ovarian biology technologies: computational challenges, and biological insights.
Review in Reproduction (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In brief: This review synthesizes the technical landscape of current spatial transcriptomic platforms, addresses computational challenges unique to ovarian tissue, and surveys biological discoveries across ovarian development, aging, follicle dynamics, and cancer, providing a practical framework to guide platform selection and analytical strategy in reproductive biology. Abstract: The ovary is a structurally complex organ whose function depends on precisely coordinated interactions among multiple cell types. Spatially resolved transcriptomics (ST) has emerged as a powerful complement to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), enabling gene expression profiling within intact tissue and preserving the spatial context that dissociation-based methods inherently lack. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the major ST platforms, including sequencing-based technologies (Visium, Visium HD, Stereo-seq, and GeoMx) and imaging-based technologies (Xenium, MERSCOPE, and CosMx), with a focus on their distinct technical features, resolution trade-offs, and suitability for ovarian research. We survey 40 published studies applying ST to ovarian biology, spanning atlases, ovarian aging, follicle development and ovulation, and ovarian cancer. We also discuss typical computational analyses as well as their challenges specific to ovary, including cell segmentation of morphologically diverse cell populations, deconvolution of mixed-cell capture spots in sequencing-based platforms, quality control, batch correction, and spatially aware downstream analyses encompassing trajectory inference, cell-cell interaction modeling, gene regulatory network reconstruction, and more. Across these biological contexts, multimodal integration, pairing ST with scRNA-seq, spatial proteomics, or chromatin accessibility profiling, has proven increasingly valuable for resolving the full molecular complexity of ovarian biology. Nevertheless, some challenges persist, and no single platform is universally optimal for all research questions. Thoughtful alignment between biological objectives, tissue scale, and platform capability will be critical for advancing ST from descriptive mapping toward mechanistic and clinically translatable discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.