ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2026
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Adverse Maternal Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess associations between pregestational and early-gestational exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and maternal pregnancy complications. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search across the PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted from inception to November 2025. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Eligibility criteria for inclusion were 1) exposure to GLP-1 RAs before or during gestation; 2) cohort, case-control, or randomized controlled trial (RCT) study reporting quantitative data on maternal obstetric outcomes; and 3) study population greater than 10. Two reviewers independently abstracted study data and assessed quality and risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for observational studies and the Risk of Bias for Randomized Crossover Trials tool for RCTs. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random effects with the Knapp-Hartung adjustment to reduce chance of false-positives and the restricted maximum likelihood estimator for heterogeneity testing. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
resultsEight studies totaling 186,598 pregnancies (47,159 exposed) were included. No statistically significant differences were seen for gestational diabetes (OR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.61-1.61), preterm birth (OR 1.01, 95% CI, 0.76-1.33), preeclampsia (OR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.60-1.84), or hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (OR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.34-1.83), although results from leave-one-out sensitivity testing suggest that GLP-1 RA exposure may have a protective effect against developing gestational diabetes (OR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.67-0.98). Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale results demonstrated variability in study quality and high heterogeneity attributable to differences in exposure and outcome definitions, cohort selection, and control for confounders.
conclusionUse of a GLP-1 RA in the peri-fertilization period was not associated with change in odds of maternal pregnancy complications. Exploratory sensitivity results suggest that peri-fertilization exposure may lower odds of gestational diabetes. Further research is necessary to explore these hypotheses-generating results.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.