Evidence mapPaperPMID 42393348Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2026

Neural timescales from a computational perspective.

Roxana Zeraati, Anna Levina, Jakob H Macke, Richard Gao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roxana Zeraati *Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany. research@roxanazeraati.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7946-1464
Anna LevinaMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1355-6617
Jakob H MackeTübingen AI Center, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5154-8912
Richard Gao *Tübingen AI Center, Tübingen, Germany. r.dg.gao@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5916-6433

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 390727645EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101089288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activity fluctuates over a wide range of timescales within and across brain areas. Experimental observations suggest that diverse neural timescales reflect information in dynamic environments. However, the definitions and measurements of timescales derived from brain recordings vary across the literature. Moreover, these observations do not specify the mechanisms that underlie variations in timescales or whether specific timescales are necessary for neural computation and brain function. Here we synthesize three directions in which computational approaches can distill the broad set of empirical observations into quantitative and testable theories. We review (1) how different data analysis methods quantify timescales across distinct behavioral states and recording modalities; (2) how biophysical models provide mechanistic explanations for the emergence of diverse timescales; and (3) how task-performing networks and machine learning models uncover the functional relevance of neural timescales. This integrative computational perspective complements experimental investigations, providing a holistic view of how neural timescales reflect the relationships among brain structure, dynamics and behavior.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansMachine LearningNerve NetTime Factors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.