Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393377›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2026

A guide to CAR T cell therapies: development, current status and future prospects.

Hind Rafei, Ranjan Upadhyay, Padmanee Sharma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hind RafeiDepartment of Hematopoietic Biology and Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-4183
Ranjan UpadhyayDivision of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-5898
Padmanee SharmaJames P. Allison Institute, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. padsharma@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4658-055X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first clinical approval in 2017, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as one of the most powerful modalities for redirecting the immune response against cancer. Building on decades of foundational discoveries in T cell biology and synthetic immunoengineering, CAR T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of B cell malignancies, resulting in durable remissions in patients with B cell leukaemias, lymphomas and multiple myeloma. Next-generation CAR designs are now expanding the reach of this approach into autoimmune disease and solid tumours. Innovations in gene editing, allogeneic manufacturing and in vivo delivery are improving the scalability, safety and accessibility of CAR T cell therapies, although challenges persist in overcoming antigen heterogeneity and tumour microenvironmental barriers and in promoting the long-term persistence of CAR T cells. In this Review, we summarize the key discoveries that laid the foundations for CAR T cell therapies and provide a broad overview of the current principles of CAR design, their clinical development and emerging strategies aimed at enhancing efficacy, broadening indications and achieving durable immune control across disease types.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.