ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2026
Blast Injuries.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blast injuries present a unique challenge in trauma care due to their complex pathophysiology and potential to cause multisystem damage. Unlike conventional trauma, explosions generate a combination of penetrating, blunt, thermal, and barotrauma injuries, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The increasing prevalence of terrorist attacks, military conflicts, and industrial explosions has contributed to a global rise in blast-related casualties, affecting both military personnel and civilians.This chapter integrates clinical experience, current evidence, and established guidelines to provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating and managing blast injuries. Key areas discussed include the epidemiology, classification, injury mechanisms, and organ-specific impact of blast trauma, with a focus on neurotrauma, pulmonary injuries, cardiovascular compromise, auditory and ocular trauma, and musculoskeletal damage.Additionally, we present a pragmatic protocol for initial trauma bay management, emphasizing early recognition, timely interventions, and coordinated multidisciplinary care. Given the complexity of blast injuries, we advocate for the establishment of a research consortium to refine current management strategies and optimize patient outcomes. Through a deeper understanding of blast physics, injury patterns, and treatment approaches, clinicians can improve survival and long-term recovery for both military and civilian blast victims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42393452What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.