Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393551›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026

Electroanatomical properties and high-density mapping guided targeted isolation of superior vena cava.

Vera Maslova, Hannah Budke, Adrian Zaman, Martina E Spehlmann, Derk Frank, Evgeny Lian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vera MaslovaDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany. Vera.Maslova@uksh.de.
Hannah BudkeDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Adrian ZamanDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Martina E SpehlmannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Derk FrankDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Evgeny LianDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuperior vena cava isolation (SVCI) is associated with complications such as sinus node (SN) and phrenic nerve (PN) injury or SVC stenosis. Our study assessed the electrophysiological properties of the SVC and use of high-density mapping for targeted SVCI by ablating preferential conduction sites to avoid these complications.

methodsEighty-three consecutive patients, undergoing HD mapping of the SVC during AF re-ablation procedures were prospectively included. Conduction block (CB) lines between the right atrium and SVC, location of the sinus node (SN) and phrenic nerve (PN), and their spatial relationship to the ablation line (AbL) were assessed.

resultsCB lines were present in 98% of patients, with gaps identified in all SVC segments, most frequently posterior (73%), with a median gap width of 23.9 (14.3-37.8) mm. All gaps expressed decremental properties in the EP study. Ablation was performed in 35 (42%) patients and was achieved in all cases using targeted segmental ablation, closing the gaps between the CB lines.Median ablation duration was 88 (66; 161) seconds with a median of 8 (6-12) radiofrequency applications. SN was separated from SVC with CB line in 98% of cases, what excluded necessity to ablate in this area, distance from the AbL to the SN exit zone was 8.9 (6-14.7) mm. PN was located outside the areas of preferential conduction in all cases, distance from AbL to the PN was 10.4 (6.7-12.1) mm. No complications occurred.

conclusionsHD mapping-guided, targeted segmental SVCI using RF energy is feasible and safe.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacVena Cava, SuperiorAction PotentialsAgedFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRecurrenceTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationNon-pulmonary vein triggersSuperior vena cava

Identifiers

PMID42393551
PMCPMC13330102

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.