ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Interpretable SHAP-based machine learning framework for patient satisfaction prediction: a case study in Thammasat University Hospital.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction is a critical indicator of healthcare service quality, particularly in specialized outpatient departments where service processes are complex and resources are constrained. This study aims to develop an explainable artificial intelligence framework to predict patient satisfaction and to identify the key factors influencing satisfaction in a public ophthalmology outpatient department.
methodsSurvey data were collected and patient satisfaction was transformed into both binary and three-class settings. Multiple machine learning models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Categorical Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting, were evaluated using a nested stratified cross-validation with 5 outer folds and 5 inner GridSearchCV folds. To address class imbalance, SMOTE-NC and G-SMOTENC were applied only within the training folds. Model performance was assessed to identify the best-performing predictive approach, which was subsequently analyzed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsAmong the evaluated models, Gradient Boosting with G-SMOTENC achieved the highest performance in the binary setting, while Random Forest performed best in the three-class setting. SHAP analysis showed that length of stay contributed most strongly to satisfaction predictions in both settings, followed by demographic and visit-related variables.
conclusionThe results suggest that combining predictive modeling with SHAP-based interpretation can support transparent, context-specific assessment of patient satisfaction in the studied outpatient setting. The proposed approach provides interpretable, context-specific insights that may support data-driven resource management and future service improvement in specialized outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.