Evidence mapPaperPMID 42393740Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2026

Addressing the commercial determinants of unhealthy beverage exposure: a systems thinking approach.

Megan R Winkler, Yeeli Mui, Alexis Smith, James Krieger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan R WinklerDepartment of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. megan.winkler@emory.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-145X
Yeeli MuiCenter for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alexis SmithDepartment of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
James KriegerDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

A Systems Approach to Understanding the Interacting Factors of the Local Food Environment for Population HealthR00HL144824 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WINKLER, MEGAN · 2021 to 2023
$746k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00HL144824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe beverage industry plays an influential role in the US. Certain beverages, such as sugar-sweetened, have long been recognized as key contributors to poor population health with inequitable impacts. In response, multiple US initiatives have attempted to address these problems through public awareness campaigns and policies, such as taxes. Yet, the persistent and increasing reliance on unhealthy commercial products produced by the beverage industry suggests additional progress is needed. Leveraging a systems thinking approach, this study aimed to map out the complex forces limiting progress and driving inequitable impacts of unhealthy commercial beverages in the US to inform innovative thinking about future actions.

methodsWe facilitated a participatory group model building project to develop a systems model that depicts the main mechanisms underlying the increasing sales, marketing, and consumption of unhealthy commercial beverages. We convened 28 national experts from government, academia, advocacy, funding agencies, and community organizations for a series of workshops and interviews and supplemented their insights with other evidence (e.g., research, public records).

resultsThe final systems model makes visible the multiple interacting pathways through which industry protects their profits and maintains the status quo. Some are well known, such as normalizing product purchasing, influencing policymakers in their favor, and shaping public opinion to support their work. Others are less appreciated, such as how health and environmental consequences produced by beverage industry activities feedback into the system, ultimately leading to a greater reliance on beverage industry products and weakening political will for adopting equitable health promotion policies. While actions by advocates, public health departments, and others to address unhealthy beverages were identified, much of their impact is undermined by the large and influential control the beverage industry has on the system.

conclusionsGaining traction on addressing unhealthy commercial beverages is a complex problem with reinforcing cycles that strengthen the beverage industry's power and influence. The insights gained from the model suggest an ambitious action agenda based on systems principles that also centers the commercial determinants of health.

Indexed as

BeveragesCommerceSystems AnalysisHumansSugar-Sweetened BeveragesUnited StatesCausal loop diagramEnvironmental justiceHealth equityNon-sugar sweetened beveragesSugar-sweetened beveragesWater security

Identifiers

PMID42393740
PMCPMC13411964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.