Evidence mapPaperPMID 42393837Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Pilot Test of a Diet Cost Calculation Process for Use in Economic Evaluations of Dietary Interventions.

Monique Aucoin, Hainan Yu, Melissa Murphy, Nicole Yoannou, Laura LaChance, Kieran Cooley, Patricia M Herman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Pilot Test of a Diet Cost Calculation Process for Use in Economic Evaluations of Dietary Interventions.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monique AucoinCanadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6804-5844
Hainan YuOntario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Melissa MurphyCalifornia State University San Bernardino, San Bernardino, California, USA.
Nicole YoannouCanadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura LaChanceCanadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kieran CooleyCanadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7960-6504
Patricia M HermanRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.

Funding

RAND REACH CenterU24AT012549 · RAND CORPORATION · 2025 to 2025
$3.7M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT012549NCCIH NIH HHS U24AT012549NCMIC Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutrition is a significant modifiable risk factor for many illnesses. One often-cited barrier to diet change is the perceived cost of healthy food. While many diet diary templates exist, none have been developed to capture the data needed for calculating the cost of a diet consumed during a diet intervention study.

methodsThe objective of the present project was to develop and pilot test (1) a tailored diet diary template with instructions, and (2) alternative approaches for calculating diet cost. We created a draft diet diary and instructions which were used by participants. We used those data to test the feasibility of calculating weekly diet cost. Two methods were used: calculation of the cost of the actual price of the items purchased, and standardised prices. Acceptability was assessed by conducting participant interviews and the feedback that was provided was used to revise them. The methods to calculate costs were compared in terms of feasibility and researcher time needed.

resultsOf the 15 participants enrolled, 14 completed the interview. All participants reported that the process was acceptable or highly acceptable. Participant feedback was used to guide changes to the diet diary and instructions. Costs were calculated for 85.3% to 96.3% of food items. The researcher time needed to complete each method per participant, per week was 5 to 6.5 h. Participants who gave feedback confirmed that the edits addressed their previous concerns.

conclusionsOverall, the diet diary and instructions were acceptable to participants who are women and feasible for the collection and costing of diet data in Canada.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisDietDiet RecordsAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projectscostdietdiet therapyhealth economics

Identifiers

PMID42393837
PMCPMC13328808

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.