ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Neural Markers of Interocular Grouping During Binocular Rivalry With MEG.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Binocular rivalry (BR) occurs when incompatible images are simultaneously presented, one to each eye, and elicit perceptual alternations between image dominance and suppression. Remarkably, BR accommodates interocular grouping (IOG) such that portions of two globally coherent images shown separately to each eye, results in frequent global pattern perception. We investigated the neural correlates of BR and IOG with magnetoencephalography (MEG). Stimuli consisted of red or green orthogonal gratings flickering at 5 or 6.67 Hz, allowing for analysis of tagged fundamental, intermodulation frequencies, and steady-state visually evoked responses (N = 25). Our design included conditions with systematically increasing grouping demands; 2 or 4 complementary patches, with vertical or horizontal meridian image divisions. Participants reported their perception of dominant or mixed percepts, and the latter increased with grouping demands. IOG showed weaker fundamental power than BR in early visual cortex during perceptual dominance, while power for suppression was less affected in depth and topography. Multivariate logistic regression further highlighted differences between BR and IOG in V1 and V2, as well as higher-order visual areas (i.e., IP and LO). A support vector machine distinguished between dominance and suppression, with the highest accuracy near the time of the perceptual alternation. Interestingly, only the conditions with high IOG demands produced higher order intermodulation frequencies and significantly correlated with alternation rate in V1. Overall, we show evidence of a broad similarity for BR and IOG in neural representations across the visual cortex, as well as enhanced mechanisms of monocular image competition via segmentation and integration for IOG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.