ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Homologous recombination pathway alterations in basal-like breast cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease comprising multiple molecular subtypes with distinct biological and clinical features. Among them, the basal-like subtype accounts for approximately 15-20% of cases and is associated with poor prognosis. Basal-like breast cancers (BLBC) share several histo-molecular characteristics with BRCA1-deficient tumors, including genomic instability and reduced BRCA1 expression beyond germline-mutated cases, suggesting potential alterations in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. These observations have led to the hypothesis that homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may be enriched in a subset of BLBC. However, the extent, causes, and clinical implications of HRD in this subtype remain incompletely defined, as much of the available evidence is derived from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohorts, which only partially overlap with BLBC. In this review, we first summarize the transcriptomic definition of BLBC and its relationship to TNBC. We then provide a concise overview of current HRD detection methods, followed by a critical analysis of their application specifically to basal-like tumors. We next examine the molecular mechanisms that may contribute to HRD in BLBC, distinguishing well-supported alterations from emerging mechanisms. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic implications of HRD in BLBC, highlighting current limitations of clinical evidence and the challenges of translating a biologically defined subtype into a clinically actionable framework. Overall, while a BLBC-centered approach may offer a more biologically homogeneous context to study HRD, its clinical relevance remains to be established, and future studies specifically designed in molecularly defined cohorts will be required to clarify its diagnostic and therapeutic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.