Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394754›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Two-factor synaptic plasticity enables memory consolidation during neuronal burst firing.

Kathleen Jacquerie, Danil Tyulmankov, Pierre Sacré, Guillaume Drion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathleen JacquerieBiology Department, Marder Lab, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4435-3057
Danil TyulmankovCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, 3227 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-1396
Pierre SacréDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Allée de la Découverte 10, Liège 4000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7228-1628
Guillaume DrionDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Allée de la Découverte 10, Liège 4000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-9500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How can brain circuits remain plastic enough to encode new information while still stabilizing synaptic changes that support long-term memory? Many circuits switch between tonic spiking, which encodes external inputs, and burst firing, which is generated collectively; yet how these firing-state changes interact with synaptic plasticity to support consolidation remains unclear. Here, we ask whether burst epochs can provide a minimal, mechanistically interpretable route to stabilizing memories encoded during tonic firing. We introduce a two-factor synaptic plasticity rule in a conductance-based spiking network that switches robustly between tonic and burst regimes. The effective synaptic strength is expressed as the product of two factors: a primary, flexible factor updated by a Hebbian mechanism, and a secondary factor that captures stabilizing processes. The secondary factor is adjusted according to the rate of change of the primary factor. In a pattern recognition case study, the network encodes new inputs during tonic firing and undergoes burst epochs. This two-factor rule stabilizes previously learned patterns, integrates information across samples to support generalization, and improves robustness to noise. Ablation experiments show that these outcomes require a synergy between neural bursting activity and the two-factor plasticity rule: blocking secondary plasticity prevents stable retention, replacing bursts with quiescence leads to fading memories, and replacing bursts with additional tonic firing causes interference and noise sensitivity. Finally, a signal-to-noise ratio analysis across tonic-burst cycles identifies parameter regimes in which bursts either sharpen or weaken synaptic representations, consistent with consolidation or pruning, respectively.

Indexed as

eligibility traceneuromodulated synaptic plasticityneuromodulationstructural synaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID42394754
PMCPMC13323795

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.