ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Endometrial dysfunction in embryo implantation: from molecular mechanisms to clinical management.
Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial dysfunction represents a central pathological factor underlying recurrent implantation failure and infertility. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the physiological basis of endometrial function, the pathological factors compromising its integrity, and the impact of these abnormalities on embryo implantation. Key pathogenic drivers, including cellular senescence, chronic inflammation, iatrogenic injury, endometriosis, and microbiome dysbiosis, converge on common mechanistic pathways such as decidualization impairment, immune dysregulation, epigenetic alterations, and mechanosensing defects. Building upon this mechanistic framework, we summarize current therapeutic interventions based on published literature. Available evidence suggests that intrauterine platelet-rich plasma (PRP) infusion appears promising among evaluated adjunctive interventions, but its definitive clinical superiority remains to be confirmed in large, standardized, head-to-head randomized trials. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), growth hormone, and stem cell-based therapies also show therapeutic potential but require further validation through well-designed studies. This review provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the association between endometrial dysfunction and embryo implantation failure and offers a practical, evidence-informed reference for personalized clinical treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.