ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
The CRISPR-Cas toolkit for mosquito-borne virus surveillance: detection, tracing, and discovery.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mosquito-borne virus surveillance increasingly requires rapid, distributed detection of co-circulating pathogens, serotypes, and lineages across clinical and vector-sampling sites. CRISPR-Cas platforms offer a programmable toolkit for this purpose, but their readiness differs substantially across surveillance functions. Here, we review CRISPR-Cas methods for mosquito-borne virus surveillance across detection, tracing, and discovery-supporting targeted screening. Detection is the most advanced application: selected Cas12- and Cas13-based assays for dengue, Zika, chikungunya, West Nile, Japanese encephalitis, and related mosquito-associated viruses report sub-hour workflows, portable readouts, and targeted serotype- or lineage-marker discrimination. However, performance remains assay-, target-, and sample-matrix-dependent, and validation in pooled mosquito samples and field settings is still limited. Tracing currently relies mainly on validated portable amplicon-sequencing workflows, whereas CRISPR-aided sample-preparation methods such as DASH, FLASH, RAPID-DASH, and Cas9-targeted enrichment remain transferable opportunities for host depletion or target enrichment rather than established mosquito-borne virus genomic-surveillance workflows. For discovery-oriented surveillance, multiplex CRISPR-Cas systems such as CARMEN can support targeted screening of known or near-neighbor viruses represented by predesigned crRNAs, while metagenomic next-generation sequencing remains necessary for divergent or previously unknown viruses. Across these functions, CRISPR-Cas programmability may accelerate parts of assay redesign, but practical retargeting still requires compatible amplification primers, effector-specific target constraints, cross-reactivity assessment, and analytical revalidation. Routine surveillance use will require integrated demonstrations with clinical and pooled-vector samples, comparison against established molecular and sequencing methods, cost validation, and regulatory evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.