ArticleJournal of ginseng research2026
Effect of diabetes on the efficacy and safety of
Article in Journal of ginseng research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is a risk factor of poor stroke outcomes. A randomized clinical trial has demonstrated that Methods: The PANDA (efficacy and safety of Results: In the modified intention-to-treat dataset, there were 722 patients with diabetes or treated hyperglycemia during hospitalization (369 in the Xuesaitong group and 353 in the placebo group) and 2244 patients without (1118 in the Xuesaitong group and 1126 in the placebo group). Among patients with diabetes or treated hyperglycemia during hospitalization, the proportion of patients with functional independence at 3 months was 83.20 % (n = 307) in the Xuesaitong group and 79.60 % (n = 281) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 1.27; 95 % confidence intervals [CI], 0.87-1.85; P = 0.215). Regarding patients without diabetes or treated hyperglycemia during hospitalization, the proportion was 91.32 % (n = 1021) in the Xuesaitong group and 83.21 % (n = 937) in the control group (OR, 2.12; 95 % CI, 1.64-2.76; P < 0.001; P for interaction = 0.027). The sensitivity analyses indicated similar significant results. Conclusion: In the PANDA trial, patients without, rather than with, diabetes or treated hyperglycemia during hospitalization received greater benefit from Xuesaitong soft capsules regarding functional independence at 3 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.