Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395095›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026

Randomized crossover trial comparing short-term hemodynamic and autonomic effects of e-cigarettes with and without nicotine and conventional cigarette smoking in apparently healthy individuals.

Piotr Sobieraj, Paweł Dziliński, Maciej Siński, Sławomir Kujawski, Paweł Zalewski, Jacek Lewandowski

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03037775 (The Influence of Electronic and Traditional Cigarettes Smoking on Hemodynamic Parameters and Sympathetic Nerves Activity in Healthy People), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03037775 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Influence of Electronic and Traditional Cigarettes Smoking on Hemodynamic Parameters and Sympathetic Nerves Activity in Healthy People

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2015 to 2017Enrolled50ConditionsTobacco, Use, HarmfulArmsBaseline, e-cigarette without nicotine, e-cigarette with nicotine, traditional cigarette
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piotr SobierajDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, 1a Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł DzilińskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, 1a Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej SińskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, 1a Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Sławomir KujawskiDepartment of Exercise Physiology and Functional Anatomy, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 85-077 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Paweł ZalewskiDepartment of Exercise Physiology and Functional Anatomy, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 85-077 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Jacek LewandowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, 1a Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To assess the short-term cardiovascular and autonomic nervous system effects of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS), and conventional cigarettes in apparently healthy adults. Methods: In this randomized crossover study, 42 healthy volunteers aged 18-60 years with a history of conventional cigarette smoking completed three experimental sessions in random order, using ENDS, ENNDS, or conventional cigarettes. Hemodynamic and autonomic parameters-including heart rate (HR), systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure (SBP, DBP, MBP), stroke volume (SV), total peripheral resistance (TPR), and heart rate variability (HRV)-were continuously recorded on a beat-to-beat basis using a Task Force Monitor. Results: ENDS use induced acute changes: HR increased by 7.2 bpm (during intervention), SBP by 3.4 mmHg, DBP by 3.3 mmHg, and MBP by 3.7 mmHg. SV decreased, and HRV analysis indicated a shift towards sympathetic dominance. Conventional cigarettes caused similar, but more pronounced increases in SBP, DBP, and MBP during intervention (e.g., SBP 2.9 mmHg higher than ENDS). ENNDS resulted in smaller increases in HR (5.6 bpm less than ENDS), SBP (2.7 mmHg less), DBP (2.1 mmHg less), and MBP (2.6 mmHg less) compared to ENDS. Conclusion: ENDS and conventional cigarettes both induce acute cardiovascular stress, characterized by increased HR and BP, reduced SV, and sympathetic activation. The hemodynamic and autonomic effects of ENDS closely resemble those of conventional cigarettes. Although attenuated, ENNDS use was not physiologically neutral, raising concerns regarding its cardiovascular safety as an alternative to traditional smoking. Public trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03037775.

Indexed as

Autonomic nervous systemBlood pressureElectronic nicotine delivery systemElectronic non-nicotine delivery system combustible cigaretteHeart rate

Identifiers

PMID42395095
PMCPMC13326061

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.