Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395165›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of nuclear medicine2026

Observation on Discordant Treatment Response on [

Rangat Bagasariya, Sunita Sonavane, Sandip Basu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rangat BagasariyaRadiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0009-0008-6220-2907
Sunita SonavaneRadiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8751-0481
Sandip BasuRadiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6607-2558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dual-tracer positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using [ Case: A 60-year-old male with papillary thyroid carcinoma (pT2 pN1a pM0) underwent total thyroidectomy and bilateral neck dissection. After defaulting from follow-up, he developed diffuse pulmonary and mediastinal metastases. Following one therapeutic dose of 200 mCi (7.4 GBq) [ Conclusion: Discordant response patterns between FDG and FAPI PET/CT highlight the complementary biological information provided by dual-tracer imaging. Reduction in stromal FAP expression did not equate to metabolic remission. Combined interpretation may improve response assessment in radioiodine-refractory DTC.

Indexed as

[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT[ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04differentiated thyroid carcinomalenvatinibTENIS syndrometyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID42395165
PMCPMC13327778

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.