ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
What are the optimal strategies to communicate the risk of poor air quality exposure to vulnerable groups?
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ambient air pollution is a critical global health concern. Individuals living with preexisting health conditions in urban and/or deprived areas and ethnic minorities groups are at particular risk. The WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines have highlighted the importance of effectively communicating the risk of poor air quality exposure to vulnerable groups so they can take actions to protect themselves. This study explored the optimal strategies to communicate this risk to vulnerable groups. Methods: In-depth, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with participants ( Findings: We developed a theory- and evidence-based framework for communicating the health impacts of poor air quality. We identified key components of a communication strategy focussing on the need for: tailored information on risks and harms, a range of inclusive and actionable recommendations, and considerations around the source (healthcare-provider, peers) and channel of communication (SMS, community-based). Interpretation: This study provides novel insights from vulnerable demographic groups supporting the need for air quality information to be accessible, understandable and tailored. Communicating via trusted sources, e.g., healthcare professionals and/or community-based peer networks is important. Further research should explore the impact of interventions on behaviour change, particularly across vulnerable groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.