ArticleDigital health
Exploring perceptions of data risks in AI-enabled nursing research: A qualitative study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To explore the data risk perception structure and connotation in the entire process of generative AI-enabled nursing research and to identify healthcare management and training needs as applied to digital health developments. Background: Nursing research highly relies on contextualized and unstructured data. General generative AI still faces shortcomings in professional adaptation, data governance, and responsibility definition, which may lead to risks such as privacy leaks, amplified bias, academic misconduct and accountability vacuums. The study focusses on the perceptions of Future nursing professionals. Methods: Purposeful maximum variance sampling was used to recruit 20 participants from 3 universities, and semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted. The report followed the COREQ Protocol checklist. Results: Five data risk awareness themes were identified: data adaptation risk, data security risk, data quality risk, data ethics risk, and response risk, presenting risk concerns throughout the entire process of "use-generation-sharing-responsibility". Conclusion: The data risk perception of nursing master's students regarding generative AI-enabled nursing research presents a clear five-dimensional structure, unfolding along the chain of "input-processing-output-diffusion-attribution." This structure supports the development of a framework for defining boundaries of AI use, data governance, ethical compliance, and capacity building in nursing research settings and digital health developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.