ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Encoding-related fMRI BOLD activity predicts subsequent memory for studied scenes, but not subsequent identification of perceptually similar lures.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pattern separation is widely regarded as a hippocampally mediated process that reduces interference between memories of similar experiences. Performance on the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST), where the requirement is to discriminate between studied items (targets) and perceptually similar lures, is commonly held to depend on pattern separation. Specifically, it has been proposed that similar lure identification is supported by a recall-to-reject strategy, whereby lures are identified as a result of the retrieval of the corresponding studied item. According to this proposal, therefore, the encoding operations that support successful target recollection and successful lure identification should be closely similar, since both mnemonic judgments depend upon subsequent recollection of the study item. Here, using fMRI, we examined this prediction. In samples of cognitively healthy young and older adults, we employed a three-choice MST (target/lure/new) with scene and object images as test items. Using ROI-based univariate and multivoxel analyses, we assessed whether encoding-related activity was predictive of the identification of target and similar lure items on the subsequent memory test. The activity elicited by scene images predicted memory performance for subsequently presented targets but not for corresponding similar lures, contrary to the recall-to-reject hypothesis. No effects could be identified for either class of object test items. The magnitude of the encoding effects for the scene targets was age-invariant, and, moreover, the univariate scene SMEs demonstrated a robust, age-invariant association with the target-lure discriminability metric.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.