Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42395409›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Annotating Interchromosomal Interactions at Sub-Megabase Resolution Using Network Clustering Coefficients.

Yingjie Xu, Ian J Anderson, Rachel P McCord, Tongye Shen

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yingjie XuGenome Science and Technology, Bredesen Center, The University of Tennessee Knoxville.ORCID 0009-0001-8878-8765
Ian J AndersonPratt School of Engineering, Duke University.
Rachel P McCordDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee Knoxville.ORCID 0000-0003-0010-5323
Tongye ShenDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee Knoxville.

Funding

Folding, Misfolding, and Unfolding: How human 3D genome structure resists, adapts, or succumbs to physical stresses in health and diseaseR35GM133557 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI Rachel Patton McCord · 2019 to 2026
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific interchromosomal interactions involve communication between non-homologous chromosomes, enabling coordinated genomic activities such as gene regulation. However, because these communications are often embedded within a nonspecific and noisy background of contact interactions, it is essential to annotate these interaction patterns at the resolution of genomic positions. Such annotation facilitates clean visualization and comparison with linear genomic features to reveal underlying biological functions. We developed and validated a set of network-based metrics as cross-chromosomal interaction descriptors that bridge complex 3D genome structures and 1D functional genomics. By utilizing graph-theoretic representations, these network-based features succinctly summarize complex inter-chromosomal relationships. We constructed a graph representation of contact interactions derived from Hi-C data and implemented three annotations that capture the distinct "many-body" nature of the interactions. Among these, we demonstrate that ΔC4 (a cis-contact-mediated 4-cycle interaction metric) is superior to both ΔC3 (a cis-contact-mediated 3-cycle metric) and C4

Indexed as

chromatin state descriptorsclustering coefficientinter-chromosomal contact interactionnetwork analysisnetwork layout

Identifiers

PMID42395409
PMCPMC13320845

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.