ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Association between atherogenic index of plasma in early pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and preeclampsia (PE). Methods: This retrospective multicenter observational cohort study included 2,162 preeclampsia cases and 36,660 normal controls who met the eligibility criteria. AIP was measured before 20 weeks of gestation and calculated as log10 [TG (mmol/L)/HDL-C (mmol/L)]. Participants were divided into four groups according to AIP quartiles (Q1-Q4). Multivariable logistic regression, subgroup analysis, and smooth curve fitting were applied to examine the association between AIP and PE, as well as related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Results: After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that participants in the Q3 and Q4 groups had significantly higher risks of PE and gestational diabetes mellitus with preeclampsia (GDM&PE) compared with those in the Q1 group. The magnitude of the independent association was modest: every 0.1 increase in AIP was associated with an 8% higher risk of PE (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10, Conclusion: In this retrospective observational cohort, elevated AIP in early pregnancy was associated with higher risks of PE and GDM&PE, although the adjusted effect sizes were modest. AIP may be considered a potential risk marker for PE and GDM&PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.