ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2026
Lupus nephritis and kidney transplantation: A narrative review of patient and graft outcomes.
Review in World journal of nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN), a serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite significant advances in immunosuppressive therapy, many patients progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), for which kidney transplantation (KT) remains the treatment of choice. However, the survival advantage of KT in LN-related ESKD is not yet clearly defined. This narrative review synthesizes current guidelines and recent evidence to address the distinctive challenges of transplantation in patients with autoimmune conditions such as LN, particularly regarding the optimal timing of KT. While existing recommendations emphasize achieving disease quiescence prior to transplantation, emerging data support the benefits of preemptive KT and individualized immunosuppressive regimens in improving both patient and graft outcomes. Advances in immunosuppressive therapies, including newly approved agents such as voclosporin and belimumab, have further enhanced LN management. In addition, novel biomarkers such as urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, B-cell activating factor and matrix metalloproteinase-7 show promise for monitoring disease activity and predicting post-transplant recurrence risk. A comprehensive appraisal of guidelines and contemporary studies is essential to refine management strategies and optimize long-term outcomes for patients with LN undergoing KT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.