ReviewBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
Plant-derived extracellular vesicles as bioactive nanoplatforms: Biogenesis, therapeutic evidence, and translational challenges.
Review in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plant-derived extracellular vesicles (PDEVs) are nanoscale membrane vesicles isolated from edible or medicinal plants. They have attracted interest because they combine endogenous biological activity with the practical advantages of scalable natural nanocarriers. Objective: This mini-review examines PDEVs from a pharmaceutical development perspective rather than as a broad catalogue of biological observations. We focus on how vesicle source, isolation workflow, cargo composition, and route of administration affect therapeutic interpretation and translational feasibility. Content: We summarize PDEV biogenesis, isolation, characterization, and interaction with mammalian cells, and compare PDEVs with mammalian exosomes and synthetic liposomes. Representative preclinical studies in bone repair, neurological injury, inflammatory and gastrointestinal disease, cancer, and renal stone disease are critically evaluated, with attention to dose heterogeneity, model limitations, and mechanistic strength. We also discuss PDEVs as engineered carriers for exogenous therapeutics and revisit the debate around dietary plant miRNA uptake and cross-kingdom regulation. Conclusion: PDEVs offer several practical advantages, including oral compatibility, scalable sourcing, and potential dual use as intrinsic therapeutics and delivery systems. The field remains limited by inconsistent terminology, non-standardized purification, incomplete pharmacokinetic profiling, and scarce clinical data. Future translation will require rigorous quality control, reproducible potency assays, comprehensive biodistribution studies, and clear regulatory positioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.