ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The role of statins in the treatment of lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have substantially improved outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, both primary and acquired resistance limit their long-term efficacy. Statins have shown potential to modulate cholesterol metabolism and EGFR-related signaling, and may therefore influence treatment outcomes in this population. Current clinical evidence remains inconsistent and heterogeneous. This study aims to systematically evaluate whether statin use is associated with improved efficacy outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKIs, while also assessing reported adverse events as a supplementary safety outcome. Methods: This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Data, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database will be searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating statin exposure in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKIs. The websites of key academic societies and clinical trial registries will also be reviewed. Two reviewers will independently select studies and extract data. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), with particular attention to confounding and time-related biases in observational studies. Overall survival will be the primary outcome, and progression-free survival will be the key secondary outcome. Randomized and observational studies will be synthesized separately, and subgroup, sensitivity, and reporting bias analyses will be conducted where appropriate. Discussion: Preclinical studies suggest that statins may enhance the antitumor activity of EGFR-TKIs, but the clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This protocol will synthesize available evidence to evaluate whether statin exposure is associated with the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, and to explore potential sources of heterogeneity across studies. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251111062, PROSPERO CRD420251111062.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.