ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of 20% Versus 50% Glucose Solutions Administered by Paramedics to Patients With Hypoglycemia.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of 50% and 20% glucose solutions administered to patients with hypoglycemia in prehospital settings. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed cases of hypoglycemia treated by paramedics with either 50% or 20% glucose solution (40 mL) between 2016 and 2023 in the Shida-Haibara district of Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. The primary outcome was the degree of improvement in the Japan Coma Scale (JCS). Secondary outcomes were the blood glucose level at hospital arrival and the proportion of patients exhibiting JCS improvement, rebound hypoglycemia, need for in-hospital glucose administration, and adverse events. Results: A total of 242 patients met the inclusion criteria (131 and 111 in the 50% and 20% groups, respectively). The median initial blood glucose levels were similar (31 vs. 30 mg/dL), but they were significantly higher in the 50% group upon hospital arrival (151 vs. 81 mg/dL). The degree of JCS improvement did not differ significantly (4 vs. 3 grades). However, the proportion of patients with JCS improvement was higher in the 50% group (92% vs. 82%). Rebound hypoglycemia occurred in 15% and 9.0% of the patients, respectively (not statistically significant). In-hospital glucose administration was less frequent in the 50% group (42% vs. 75%). No soft tissue injuries were observed. Conclusion: The degree of JCS improvement did not differ significantly between the two groups; however, the 50% glucose solution was superior in some secondary outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.