ReviewJournal of intensive medicine2026
Current evidence and future directions for prophylactic anticoagulation therapy after severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of intensive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), a complication strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. While prophylactic anticoagulation has been shown to effectively reduce VTE incidence, significant uncertainty remains regarding its safety and the optimal timing of initiation. This article comprehensively reviews key aspects including anticoagulant selection, patient eligibility, therapeutic time windows, and current clinical challenges. Research gaps persist in defining appropriate anticoagulation strategies according to drug type, initiation timing, and sICH subtypes (e.g., lobar, deep, or amyloid-related hemorrhage). Future efforts should focus on conducting large-scale, multicenter, prospective clinical trials to validate the efficacy and safety of novel anticoagulants. Concurrently, integrating machine learning to develop high-precision risk prediction models, tailoring individualized treatment approaches, and establishing multidisciplinary collaborative research frameworks are essential steps toward advancing the standardization and rationalization of prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with severe sICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.