ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Wearable sensing for quantifying cognitive and balance functions in naturalistic movements of older adults with mild cognitive impairment in therapeutic environments.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a clinically important stage preceding Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, in which cognitive and balance functions are commonly evaluated using standard clinical assessments such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest). These assessments are administered episodically by clinicians and may miss functional changes during everyday movement. Recent studies and prior work in the Charlie and Harriet Shaffer Cognitive Empowerment Program (CEP), a therapeutic environment supporting lifestyle intervention and naturalistic social interaction, suggest that wearable and passive behavioral sensing can monitor movement patterns associated with cognitive and balance function in older adults with MCI. However, it remains unclear whether passive waist-mounted IMU data collected during naturalistic movement and social interaction can quantify clinician-rated cognitive and balance outcomes, particularly at the subdomain level, in an interpretable and demographically fair manner. To address this gap, we analyzed weekly IMU recordings collected over 6 months from 44 older adults with MCI in the CEP and trained tree-based ensemble regression models to estimate MoCA and Mini-BESTest total and subdomain scores, with interpretability and demographic fairness evaluation. Our models achieved RMSEs of 3.677 for MoCA and 3.672 for Mini-BESTest, benchmarked against Minimal Detectable Change and Minimal Clinically Important Difference thresholds. Feature importance analysis showed distinct movement signal properties across assessments, with general movement intensity features most informative for MoCA and temporal gait features led by cadence most informative for Mini-BESTest. Demographic bias analysis identified sex-related model bias, mitigated through post-processing while maintaining performance. This study supports the feasibility of wearable-based estimation of clinical assessment scores in older adults with MCI during naturalistic activity, with comparable performance between sexes after bias mitigation. This advances the validation of passive sensing for home monitoring to support clinical decision-making and personalized interventions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.