Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396304›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction From Screening Breast Ultrasound Using Deep Learning.

Yuxuan Chen, Haoyan Yang, Yanqi Xu, Ria Soni, Laura Heacock, Maciej Lis, Aleksandra Stanek, Tomasz Puto, Alana Amarosa Lewin, Linda Moy and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuxuan ChenPerlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Haoyan YangDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Yanqi XuCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Ria SoniDepartment of Internal Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Laura HeacockDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Maciej LisClinical Diagnostic Imaging Center, 5th Military Hospital with Polyclinic in Krakow, 30-901 Krakow, Poland.
Aleksandra StanekClinical Diagnostic Imaging Center, 5th Military Hospital with Polyclinic in Krakow, 30-901 Krakow, Poland.
Tomasz PutoClinical Diagnostic Imaging Center, 5th Military Hospital with Polyclinic in Krakow, 30-901 Krakow, Poland.
Alana Amarosa LewinDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Linda MoyDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Freya SchnabelDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Yiqiu ShenDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Behavioral Phenoscreening: Remote Assessment of Child Mental Health (REACH)UF1MH141129 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SHUFFREY, LAUREN CHRISTINE, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2025 to 2025
$7.7M
Leveraging Multi-Modal AI for Selective Use of Ultrasound in Breast Cancer ScreeningR01EB036530 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Alana Amarosa Lewin, Yiqiu Shen · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB036530NIMH NIH HHS UF1 MH141129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a deep learning model for five-year breast cancer risk prediction from screening breast ultrasound (BUS) examinations. Methods: This retrospective study included 295,298 breast ultrasound examinations from 122,072 women imaged between 2012 and 2020. Patients were split into training, validation, and test sets; the test set included screening examinations only. BUS-Risk-Net aggregated image features using attention-based multiple instance learning and combined them with age and ultrasound-estimated breast density to predict 2- to 5-year risk. Performance was compared with the full Tyrer-Cuzick model in a matched case-control cohort and with a reduced Tyrer-Cuzick model in the held-out test set. Risk stratification was evaluated within BI-RADS density categories. Results: In the matched case-control cohort (n = 240 women), BUS-Risk-Net achieved a 5-year AUC of 0.632 (95% CI, 0.562-0.702), versus 0.514 for the full Tyrer-Cuzick model (95% CI, 0.440-0.588; Discussion: Deep learning models applied to screening breast ultrasound could enable long-term breast cancer risk prediction and stratify risk beyond breast density alone. External and prospective validation is needed before clinical use.

Indexed as

Breast CancerBreast UltrasoundDeep LearningRisk Prediction

Identifiers

PMID42396304
PMCPMC13320933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.