ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
MCH-Guard: Multimodal Machine Learning Framework for Risk Stratification of Cerebral Microhemorrhage Risk in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Efficient cerebral microhemorrhage (MCH) monitoring is critical for anti-amyloid therapy safety due to ARIA-H risk. We developed MCH-Guard, a multimodal machine-learning framework, to stratify MCH risk using ADNI data (N=813). Methods: Nested models integrated clinical history, fluid biomarkers, and imaging to predict MCH presence, incidence, and stability. Results: The comprehensive model detected baseline MCH with high accuracy (AUC 0.86). Notably, the "minimal" model (M1), utilizing only demographics and clinical history, achieved robust performance (AUC 0.82). Longitudinal models predicted time-to-onset (R Conclusions: MCH-Guard offers a flexible clinical decision-support tool for optimizing spontaneous MCH & ARIA surveillance. The strong performance of the clinical-only M1 model supports equitable risk assessment in resource-limited settings, while the characterization of vascular instability addresses a critical confounder in safety monitoring.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.