ReviewIndian journal of psychiatry2026
A bibliometric assessment of the
Review in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Aim: This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to evaluate the journal's publication trends and citation impact from 2009 to 2024. Methods: Bibliographic data were retrieved from the Scopus database, covering the period from January 2009 to December 2024. A final dataset of 2,357 publications was analyzed for this paper. Results: The journal experienced robust growth, registering an average annual publication growth rate of 9.16% over the 16 years. The journal's Impact Factor rose significantly from 0.384 in 2010 to a peak of 3.1 in 2022. Authors from India contributed 88.63% of the total output, anchored by institutions such as the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, and the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, although international contributions from countries like Switzerland (Citation per paper [CPP]: 22.36), Germany (CPP: 17.68), Canada (CPP: 17.68), and Italy (CPP: 17.63) demonstrated a higher citation efficiency compared to those from India (11.6). The authorship pattern revealed a definitive shift from single-author (reduced from 28.65% to 9.9%) to collaborative, multiauthor research. Thematically, research concentrated on core areas such as depression and schizophrenia, while displaying responsiveness to emerging crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: The IJP has consistently demonstrated a trajectory of upward influence and academic reputation over the past 16 years. While the journal serves as a vibrant ecosystem for domestic research, future strategies should focus on leveraging international collaborations to enhance global visibility and citation impact further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.