ArticleResearch square2026
Burden of Diagnosed Diabetes among People With and Without HIV in Uganda: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Rakai Community Cohort Study.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study cohort (N = 17,716) had a mean age of 32.8 years (± 12.4) and was 53.7% female. The weighted prevalence was 0.92% for diagnosed diabetes and 16.9% for lab-confirmed HIV. Females had a higher prevalence of both HIV (20.6%, 95% CI: 19.8-21.4) and diabetes (1.14%, 95% CI: 0.95-1.38%) compared to males. Overall, diagnosed diabetes prevalence did not differ significantly by HIV serostatus (HIV-positive: 0.93%, 95% CI: 0.78-1.08%; HIV-negative: 0.92%, 95% CI: 0.65%-1.32%). After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), household-based socio-economic status, and community type, HIV serostatus was not associated with diagnosed diabetes (aPR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.50-1.13, p = 0.17), even after stratification by sex or community type. Significant independent risk factors for diagnosed diabetes included older age, higher BMI, higher socioeconomic status, and residence in a fishing community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.