ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians
Serious mental illness and cancer: A call to action for equitable care.
Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer advances are not distributed equitably among many segments of the population. Specifically, individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) face compounded disparities in cancer detection, treatment, and survival. SMI, characterized by conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe major depression, is associated with significant functional impairment and a two-to-three-decade reduction in life expectancy. Patients with SMI encounter unique challenges when navigating cancer care, including fragmented care pathways, less access to cancer therapeutics, limited psychosocial support, stigma, heightened vulnerability to diagnostic overshadowing where symptoms are attributed to their psychiatric rather than a medical or oncologic condition, and underrepresentation in therapeutic clinical trials. This review explores the intersection of SMI and cancer care starting with the conceptual background and its importance related to cancer outcomes and the delivery of ethical care to highlight unmet needs and a multitude of barriers. The paper proposes practical recommendations to improve cancer care for individuals with SMI who develop cancer including adopting the collaborative care model, enhancing psychosocial and psychiatric integration in oncology settings, and addressing biases inherent in clinician training. Interventions targeting individual, interpersonal, health system, and policy levels are essential to comprehensively mitigating disparities and developing durable cancer delivery strategies. Equitable cancer care for patients with SMI is both a moral imperative and a cornerstone of advancing social justice in oncology. Thus, there is a critical need to prioritize the translation of research advances, to close the gap in cancer outcomes and mortality, and to improve patient outcomes and wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.