ArticleEndocrine connections2026
The application of artificial intelligence in adrenal imaging: current state of knowledge, challenges, and future directions.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdrenal incidentalomas are common findings on abdominal imaging and require assessment of malignancy risk and hormonal activity. Although most lesions are benign adenomas, differentiating them from pheochromocytomas, adrenocortical carcinomas, metastases, and hormonally active tumors remains challenging, particularly in indeterminate cases. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for improving adrenal lesion detection, segmentation, and characterization.
methodsThis narrative review was based on a structured literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2018 and 2025 using the terms 'AI', 'machine learning', 'deep learning', 'radiomics', 'adrenal glands', and 'adrenal imaging'. Priority was given to original studies on segmentation, detection, and lesion characterization. Computed tomography (CT) was the predominant modality, followed by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (PET/CT).
resultsAI applications in adrenal imaging include gland segmentation, lesion detection, functional assessment, and lesion classification. Recent segmentation models achieved Dice coefficients approaching 0.90. Detection models reported high sensitivity and specificity, although evidence remains limited for small incidentalomas in heterogeneous real-world datasets. In lesion characterization, radiomics- and deep learning-based models showed promising diagnostic performance for differentiating hormonally active adenomas from non-functioning adenomas, lipid-poor adenomas from pheochromocytomas, benign lesions from metastases, and adenomas from adrenocortical carcinoma, with several studies reporting area under the curve (AUC) values above 0.90. Multimodal approaches integrating imaging with clinical data often outperformed imaging-only models. DISCUSSION: Despite encouraging results, most studies were retrospective, single-center studies based on small or selected cohorts, limiting reproducibility and generalizability. Variability in imaging protocols, lack of external validation, and limited workflow integration remain major barriers. Current evidence supports AI mainly as a decision support tool rather than a stand-alone diagnostic system.
conclusionAI has significant potential to improve adrenal imaging by supporting faster, more accurate, and more reproducible lesion assessment. However, prospective multicenter validation, standardized methodologies, and explainable models are needed before broader clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.