Evidence mapPaperPMID 42397326Full record

ReviewAdvances in kidney disease and health2026

Hypertension in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Saving the Kidneys or the Heart?

Ekamol Tantisattamo, Elaine Ku

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in kidney disease and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ekamol TantisattamoDivision of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA; Excellent Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Elaine KuDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Pediatrics, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: elaine.ku@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Cardiovascular risk reduction in adolescents and young adults with kidney diseaseK24HL171861 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · 2025 to 2025
$126k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL171861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the known modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease, hypertension control is an attractive strategy for mitigating the risk of chronic kidney disease progression and cardiovascular disease. However, trial data have not always been consistent in terms of the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering in patients with advanced kidney dysfunction. Here, we provide an overview of the trial-grade evidence for intensive blood pressure lowering and the use of different antihypertensive agents to achieve blood pressure control, focusing on cardiorenal outcomes. The evolution of the field from the reliance on renin-angiotensin system inhibition as the first-line agent to control blood pressure to the approval of several newer therapies with proven kidney and cardiovascular benefits including sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, nonsteroidal aldosterone antagonists, and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists has advanced the care of patients with hypertension and CKD. However, evidence for these therapies remains more limited in those with advanced CKD. Further studies are needed in patients with advanced CKD who are at high risk for adverse side effects from antihypertensive therapy.

Indexed as

Advanced CKDHypertensionRAS inhibition

Identifiers

PMID42397326
PMCPMC13426288

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.